↓ Skip to main content

Chemotherapeutic Strategies for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Present and Future Developments

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Colorectal Cancer, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chemotherapeutic Strategies for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Present and Future Developments
Published in
Clinical Colorectal Cancer, August 2001
DOI 10.3816/ccc.2001.n.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in Western nations. Treatment with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin resulting in inhibition of DNA synthesis after inhibition of thymidylate synthase is the most common strategy for adjuvant and systemic chemotherapy in this disease. However, the majority of patients still fail to respond to this combination; therefore, new chemotherapeutic strategies have been developed. This process has proceeded rapidly due to a more proper translation of preclinical results to the clinic. Knowledge of proximal parameters (drug activation, drug-target interaction) and distal parameters (cell growth inhibitory parameters and cell death parameters) in drug response should offer the opportunity to discriminate between sensitivity and resistance to chemotherapy and therapeutic selectivity. This clinical commentary presents a review of a symposium held at the Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, which focused on both the preclinical and clinical aspects relating to the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2012.
All research outputs
#9,514,305
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Colorectal Cancer
#241
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,541
of 45,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Colorectal Cancer
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.