↓ Skip to main content

DNA damage recognition and repair capacities in human naı̈ve and memory T cells from peripheral blood of young and elderly subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Mechanisms of Ageing & Development, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DNA damage recognition and repair capacities in human naı̈ve and memory T cells from peripheral blood of young and elderly subjects
Published in
Mechanisms of Ageing & Development, April 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0047-6374(03)00030-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

T cells accumulate genetic damage over time but nai;ve cells display higher genomic stability and longer lifespan as compared to memory cells. We found in nai;ve and memory T cells from young and elderly subjects that DNA damage in unirradiated cells is higher in memory than in nai;ve T cells, and is increased by radiation in both cell types. Repair of the radiation-induced DNA damage was much higher in nai;ve than in memory T cells from young subjects but null in both cell types from elderly subjects. Molecular mechanisms involved in DNA damage recognition and repair were analyzed in both cell subsets from young subjects. The intracellular distribution and amount of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) complex components (ku 70, ku 80, DNA-PKcs), which are involved in the recognition and repair of DNA breaks caused by ionizing radiations, V(D)J recombination and isotype switching, was assessed in nai;ve and memory T cells from young subjects. While the expression of ku 70 and ku 80 was at comparable levels in both T cell subsets, DNA-PKcs, phosphorylated ku 80, and DNA-binding of ku 70/80 were mostly evident in nai;ve but negligible or absent in memory T cells. These findings may account for the higher genomic stability and longer lifespan of nai;ve as compared to memory human T cells from young subjects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#12,343,598
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Mechanisms of Ageing & Development
#892
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,969
of 91,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mechanisms of Ageing & Development
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.