↓ Skip to main content

Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
21 Redditors
video
7 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
1112 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, January 2001
DOI 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Because a strong and stable knee is paramount to an athlete's or patient's success, an understanding of knee biomechanics while performing the squat is helpful to therapists, trainers, sports medicine physicians, researchers, coaches, and athletes who are interested in closed kinetic chain exercises, knee rehabilitation, and training for sport. The purpose of this review was to examine knee biomechanics during the dynamic squat exercise.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1084 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 216 19%
Student > Master 159 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 9%
Student > Postgraduate 58 5%
Researcher 51 5%
Other 180 16%
Unknown 352 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 306 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 132 12%
Engineering 94 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 2%
Other 86 8%
Unknown 395 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2026.
All research outputs
#560,739
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#495
of 8,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#549
of 161,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.