↓ Skip to main content

Spike integration and cellular memory in a rhythmic network from Na+/K+ pump current dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spike integration and cellular memory in a rhythmic network from Na+/K+ pump current dynamics
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, December 2009
DOI 10.1038/nn.2444
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The output of a neural circuit results from an interaction between the intrinsic properties of neurons in the circuit and the features of the synaptic connections between them. The plasticity of intrinsic properties has been primarily attributed to modification of ion channel function and/or number. We have found a mechanism for intrinsic plasticity in rhythmically active Drosophila neurons that was not based on changes in ion conductance. Larval motor neurons had a long-lasting, sodium-dependent afterhyperpolarization (AHP) following bursts of action potentials that was mediated by the electrogenic activity of Na(+)/K(+) ATPase. This AHP persisted for multiple seconds following volleys of action potentials and was able to function as a pattern-insensitive integrator of spike number that was independent of external calcium. This current also interacted with endogenous Shal K(+) conductances to modulate spike timing for multiple seconds following rhythmic activity, providing a cellular memory of network activity on a behaviorally relevant timescale.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 3%
Germany 7 3%
United States 3 1%
Israel 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 182 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 26%
Researcher 42 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 9%
Student > Master 14 7%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 50%
Neuroscience 47 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 17 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2009.
All research outputs
#7,605,073
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#4,121
of 5,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,803
of 194,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#23
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.