You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The waterborne polyurethane dispersions based on polycarbonate diol: Effect of ionic content
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Materials Chemistry & Physics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.11.057 |
| Authors |
Suzana M. Cakić, Milena Špírková, Ivan S. Ristić, Jaroslava K. B-Simendić, Milena M-Cincović, Rafał Poręba |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 27 | 23% |
| Materials Science | 22 | 18% |
| Chemical Engineering | 17 | 14% |
| Engineering | 12 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,552,608
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Materials Chemistry & Physics
#141
of 3,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,191
of 293,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Chemistry & Physics
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,443 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.