↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cutting Edge: Differential Segregation of the Src Homology 2-Containing Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1 Within the Early NK Cell Immune Synapse Distinguishes Noncytolytic from Cytolytic Interactions
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, April 2002
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3150
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inhibitory NK receptors with ligand specificity for MHC class I recruit Src homology 2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) phosphatase and prevent autocytotoxicity. Activation of SHP-1 depends upon Src kinase-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of the inhibitory receptor. In this study we demonstrate, by quantitative temporal analysis, that talin, Lck, and SHP-1 are recruited to the synapse within 1 min in both cytolytic and noncytolytic conjugates. Polarization of talin and Lck rapidly disappears in the noncytolytic interactions but persists in cytolytic interactions, where protein kinase C-theta;, Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kDa, and lysosomes are recruited within 5 min. At 1 min SHP-1 clusters in the periphery of the cytolytic synapse, whereas it clusters in the center of the noncytolytic synapse. Lck has multifocal distribution in both synapses consistent with the shared requirement for early tyrosine phosphorylation. Our studies indicate that the spatial location of SHP-1 in the synapse distinguishes noncytolytic from cytolytic interactions within the first minute.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#7,936
of 19,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,940
of 121,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#107
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.