Effect of Alteration in Pump Speed on Pump Output and Left Ventricular Filling with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

Overview of attention for article published in ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, November 2011

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 1 X user
patent: 12 patents

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 31 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Effect of Alteration in Pump Speed on Pump Output and Left Ventricular Filling with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
Published in	ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, November 2011
DOI	10.1097/mat.0b013e318233b112
Pubmed ID	21989420
Authors	Christopher S. Hayward, Robert Salamonsen, Anne M. Keogh, John Woodard, Peter Ayre, Roslyn Prichard, Robyn Walker, Eugene Kotlyar, Peter S. Macdonald, Paul Jansz, Phillip Spratt

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	1	100%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	1	100%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	31	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Doctoral Student	4	13%
Researcher	4	13%
Student > Master	3	10%
Other	2	6%
Professor	2	6%
Other	6	19%
Unknown	10	32%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	8	26%
Engineering	8	26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	2	6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance	1	3%
Chemistry	1	3%
Other	0	0%
Unknown	11	35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2025.

All research outputs

#6,823,262

of 34,559,526 outputs

Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs

#797

of 3,574 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#37,743

of 194,198 outputs

Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs

of 14 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.