↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Analytic Algorithms for Detecting Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Ophthalmology, December 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of Analytic Algorithms for Detecting Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss
Published in
Archives of Ophthalmology, December 1991
DOI 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080120068028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2001.
All research outputs
#7,374,392
of 33,872,748 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Ophthalmology
#727
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,867
of 87,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Ophthalmology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,872,748 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.