↓ Skip to main content

Random Dot Motion Perimetry in Patients With Glaucoma and in Normal Subjects

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Ophthalmology, November 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Random Dot Motion Perimetry in Patients With Glaucoma and in Normal Subjects
Published in
American Journal of Ophthalmology, November 1995
DOI 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72205-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

MICHAEL WALL, KATHRYN M. KETOFF

Abstract

To determine whether patients with primary open-angle glaucoma have an increase in size thresholds, prolongation of reaction times, and greater localization errors to random dot motion stimuli than normal subjects. Motion perimetry, a computer graphics method of visual field testing, quantitates a subject's ability to detect a correlated shift in position of dots within a defined circular area against a background of fixed dots. We measured motion thresholds, the smallest detectable circular dot motion target, at the Humphrey 24-2 test loci. By using the subject's light-pen responses to the location of the targets, we computed motion size threshold, reaction times, and localization errors (number of pixels from where the subject touched the monitor to the target center). With motion perimetry and conventional automated perimetry, we tested one eye in each of 25 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 25 age-matched control subjects. We then generated total deviation pointwise probability plots for the patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had increased mean motion size threshold (P < .001) and increased localization errors (P < .002), compared with the control subjects. With the probability plot analysis, there was good correlation of the visual field defects between the two perimetry tests. Additionally, motion perimetry identified nerve fiber bundle-like defects in 12 patients that were not detected with conventional automated perimetry. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had abnormal motion perception with an increase in spatial localization error.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Neuroscience 3 15%
Psychology 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2001.
All research outputs
#12,044,431
of 33,872,748 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#2,853
of 8,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,573
of 34,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,872,748 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.