↓ Skip to main content

Piperazinealkanol Ester Derivatives of Indomethacin as Dual Inhibitors of 5-Lipoxygenase and Cyclooxygenase

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Piperazinealkanol Ester Derivatives of Indomethacin as Dual Inhibitors of 5-Lipoxygenase and Cyclooxygenase
Published in
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1994
DOI 10.1248/cpb.42.963
Pubmed ID
Authors

I Yamawaki, M Suzuki, K Ogawa

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,765,044
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#533
of 5,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,563
of 71,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#15
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.