↓ Skip to main content

What Do Changes in Prematch vs. Postmatch, 1, 2, and 3 Days Postmatch Body Weight Tell Us About Fluid Status in English Premiership Rugby Union Players?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Do Changes in Prematch vs. Postmatch, 1, 2, and 3 Days Postmatch Body Weight Tell Us About Fluid Status in English Premiership Rugby Union Players?
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181f15945
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study investigated changes in body weight pre and postmatch and 1, 2, and 3 days postmatch. Thirty-six players contracted to an English Premiership rugby union club had their pre and postmatch body weight and 1, 2, and 3 day postmatch body weight recorded across 14 matches played (10 at home and 4 away) during the official 2003-2004 professional rugby union season, representing a total of 262 player appearances. Body weight was recorded using a set of calibrated Seca digital scales with players wearing underwear only and toweled dry of all sweat (postmatch). Players were allowed to ingest fluid ad libitum throughout each match. A number of players recorded pre to postmatch reductions of body weight of >2% with some as high as 4.9%. Significant position-specific mean reductions in prematch to postmatch body weight (±SD) were found for both forwards (1.94 ± 0.14 kg) and backs (1.04 ± 0.17 kg). The mean gain in postmatch to 1-day postmatch body weight was significant for forwards (1.40 ± 0.27 kg) but not for backs (0.76 ± 0.30 kg). There were no significant mean differences between prematch and 2 or 3 days postmatch body weight for either forwards or backs. Forwards on average lost a significantly greater proportion of their weight pre to postmatch than backs (p = 0.005). Forwards were on average 99.5% of the prematch weight at 1 day postmatch, whereas backs were 99.7% (p = 0.598). Forwards were 99.6% of their prematch weight at 3 days postmatch, whereas backs were 100.4% (p = 0.035). Changes in fluid status can be effectively monitored by recording changes in body weight and is useful where players are undertaking training sessions within 1, 2, or 3 days after their last match as a measure of rehydration status.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 20 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2011.
All research outputs
#24,360,769
of 33,937,515 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#6,166
of 7,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,379
of 165,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#60
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,937,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.