↓ Skip to main content

Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, May 2013
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2013.224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 32 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 37 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2025.
All research outputs
#4,171,069
of 27,364,796 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#2,626
of 11,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,271
of 211,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#28
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,364,796 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.