↓ Skip to main content

Rhodopsin mutation G90D and a molecular mechanism for congenital night blindness

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rhodopsin mutation G90D and a molecular mechanism for congenital night blindness
Published in
Nature, February 1994
DOI 10.1038/367639a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Engineering 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,765,044
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#55,897
of 91,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,529
of 71,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#60
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.