↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Management Review, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records
Published in
Health Care Management Review, January 2010
DOI 10.1097/hmr.0b013e3181c3f9ad
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Health information technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs), can potentially improve patient safety in our health care system. The potential advantages include increased quality and more efficiency in the care of patients. Adoption of EHRs has been slow despite these advantages and a national call for EHR implementation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 13%
Computer Science 11 10%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Management Review
#441
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,826
of 172,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Management Review
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.