↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide significant risk associations for mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome-wide significant risk associations for mucinous ovarian carcinoma
Published in
Nature Genetics, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/ng.3336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda E Kelemen, Kate Lawrenson, Jonathan Tyrer, Qiyuan Li, Janet M Lee, Ji-Heui Seo, Catherine M Phelan, Jonathan Beesley, Xiaoqing Chen, Tassja J Spindler, Katja K H Aben, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia Antonenkova, Helen Baker, Elisa V Bandera, Yukie Bean, Matthias W Beckmann, Maria Bisogna, Line Bjorge, Natalia Bogdanova, Louise A Brinton, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Fiona Bruinsma, Ralf Butzow, Ian G Campbell, Karen Carty, Jenny Chang-Claude, Y Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Linda S Cook, Daniel W Cramer, Julie M Cunningham, Cezary Cybulski, Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Joe Dennis, Ed Dicks, Jennifer A Doherty, Thilo Dörk, Andreas du Bois, Matthias Dürst, Diana Eccles, Douglas T Easton, Robert P Edwards, Ursula Eilber, Arif B Ekici, Svend Aage Engelholm, Peter A Fasching, Brooke L Fridley, Yu-Tang Gao, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Graham G Giles, Rosalind Glasspool, Ellen L Goode, Marc T Goodman, Jacek Grownwald, Patricia Harrington, Philipp Harter, Hanis Nazihah Hasmad, Alexander Hein, Florian Heitz, Michelle A T Hildebrandt, Peter Hillemanns, Estrid Hogdall, Claus Hogdall, Satoyo Hosono, Edwin S Iversen, Anna Jakubowska, Allan Jensen, Bu-Tian Ji, Beth Y Karlan, Melissa Kellar, Joseph L Kelley, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Camilla Krakstad, Susanne K Kjaer, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Diether Lambrechts, Sandrina Lambrechts, Nhu D Le, Alice W Lee, Shashi Lele, Arto Leminen, Jenny Lester, Douglas A Levine, Dong Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Karen Lu, Jan Lubinski, Lene Lundvall, Leon F A G Massuger, Keitaro Matsuo, Valerie McGuire, John R McLaughlin, Iain McNeish, Usha Menon, Francesmary Modugno, Joanna Moes-Sosnowska, Kirsten B Moysich, Steven A Narod, Lotte Nedergaard, Roberta B Ness, Heli Nevanlinna, Noor Azmi Mat Adenan, Kunle Odunsi, Sara H Olson, Irene Orlow, Sandra Orsulic, Rachel Palmieri Weber, James Paul, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Tanja Pejovic, Liisa M Pelttari, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Malcolm C Pike, Elizabeth M Poole, Susan J Ramus, Harvey A Risch, Barry Rosen, Mary Anne Rossing, Joseph H Rothstein, Anja Rudolph, Ingo B Runnebaum, Iwona K Rzepecka, Helga B Salvesen, Joellen M Schildkraut, Ira Schwaab, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yurii B Shvetsov, Nadeem Siddiqui, Weiva Sieh, Honglin Song, Melissa C Southey, Lara Sucheston, Ingvild L Tangen, Soo-Hwang Teo, Kathryn L Terry, Pamela J Thompson, Shelley S Tworoger, Anne M van Altena, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Ignace Vergote, Robert A Vierkant, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Christine Walsh, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S Whittemore, Kristine G Wicklund, Lynne R Wilkens, Wlodzimierz Sawicki, Yin-Ling Woo, Xifeng Wu, Anna H Wu, Hannah Yang, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Thomas A Sellers, Matthew L Freedman, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Paul D P Pharoah, Simon A Gayther, Andrew Berchuck

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified several risk associations for ovarian carcinomas but not for mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs). Our analysis of 1,644 MOC cases and 21,693 controls with imputation identified 3 new risk associations: rs752590 at 2q13 (P = 3.3 × 10(-8)), rs711830 at 2q31.1 (P = 7.5 × 10(-12)) and rs688187 at 19q13.2 (P = 6.8 × 10(-13)). We identified significant expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) associations for HOXD9 at 2q31.1 in ovarian (P = 4.95 × 10(-4), false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.003) and colorectal (P = 0.01, FDR = 0.09) tumors and for PAX8 at 2q13 in colorectal tumors (P = 0.03, FDR = 0.09). Chromosome conformation capture analysis identified interactions between the HOXD9 promoter and risk-associated SNPs at 2q31.1. Overexpressing HOXD9 in MOC cells augmented the neoplastic phenotype. These findings provide the first evidence for MOC susceptibility variants and insights into the underlying biology of the disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Thailand 1 1%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#657,258
of 34,226,562 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,199
of 8,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,878
of 305,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#18
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,226,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.