↓ Skip to main content

Complex formation between RAS and RAF and other protein kinases.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Complex formation between RAS and RAF and other protein kinases.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1993
DOI 10.1073/pnas.90.13.6213
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We used a Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetic system to detect the physical interaction of RAS and RAF oncoproteins. We also observed interaction between RAS and byr2, a protein kinase implicated as a mediator of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe ras1 protein. Interaction with RAS required only the N-terminal domains of RAF or byr2 and was disrupted by mutations in either the guanine nucleotide-binding or effector-loop domains of RAS. We observed interaction between MEK (a kinase that phosphorylates mitogen-activated protein kinases) and the catalytic domain of RAF. RAS and MEK also interacted but only when RAF was overexpressed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 10 10%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Chemistry 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#5,140,457
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#48,569
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,741
of 28,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#69
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.