↓ Skip to main content

ras Proteins Regulate Multiple Mitogenic Pathways in A10 Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ras Proteins Regulate Multiple Mitogenic Pathways in A10 Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Published in
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, August 1994
DOI 10.1006/bbrc.1994.2065
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Irani, S. Herzlinger, T. Finkel

Abstract

We examined the role of ras proteins in mitogenesis and proliferation of A10 smooth muscle cells. An assay was developed in which a dominant negative ras gene could be transiently expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells. As opposed to cells transfected with a control plasmid, those transfected with a dominant negative ras expression plasmid exhibited a decrease in thymidine uptake in response to serum, platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor and thrombin stimulation. In addition, expression of dominant negative ras blocked smooth muscle cell proliferation as assessed by the number of surviving colonies after transfection and neomycin selection. Our data is the first to show that ras is essential for smooth muscle cell proliferation and is a mediator in multiple smooth muscle cell mitogenic signalling pathways.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 60%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2009.
All research outputs
#5,140,598
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#2,709
of 33,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,026
of 30,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#10
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.