↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predicting short-term outcome in severely ill heart failure patients: Implications regarding listing for urgent cardiac transplantation and patient selection for temporary ventricular assist device support
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, September 1998
DOI 10.1016/s1071-9164(98)80003-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine which patients on a cardiac transplantation list required a ventricular assist device. In a preliminary study, 26 patients with decompensated severe New York Heart Association class IV chronic heart failure were studied. Blood levels for sodium, hemoglobin, cytokines, neurohormones, and hemodynamics were obtained. During short-term follow-up of 40 days, 12 patients had undergone emergent implantation of a ventricular assist device (range 1-27 days, mean 5 days), 4 died (range 14-38 days, mean 26 days), and 5 were alive and receiving only medical therapy while waiting for a transplantation. In addition, five patients had undergone transplantation (range 5-29 days, mean 18 days, excluded from further analysis). Survival curves were constructed by comparing the incidence of death and the implantation of an emergent ventricular assist device in patients with values of a variable above or below the mean value (or median for nonnormally distributed data). There was a significantly greater incidence of death or need for a ventricular assist device in patients with higher levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (P = .008), lower levels of serum sodium and hemoglobin (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively), higher heart rates (P = .03), and higher plasma norepinephrine levels (P = .01). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that only serum sodium (P = .03) independently predicted those patients who died or who required emergent left ventricular assist device. Numerous variables, particularly serum sodium, need to be considered when evaluating which patients on the transplant list require early assist device implantation or urgent transplantation. These preliminary observations merit confirmation in a larger patient population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 15 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 16 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2003.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#1,332
of 2,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,094
of 35,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them