↓ Skip to main content

Lusting While Loathing

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lusting While Loathing
Published in
Psychological Science, December 2009
DOI 10.1177/0956797609355633
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We show how being "jilted"-that is, being thwarted from obtaining a desired outcome-can concurrently increase desire to obtain the outcome, but reduce its actual attractiveness. Thus, people can come to both want something more and like it less. Two experiments illustrate such disjunctions following jilting experiences. In Experiment 1, participants who failed to win a prize were willing to pay more for it than those who won it, but were also more likely to trade it away when they ultimately obtained it. In Experiment 2, failure to obtain an expected reward led to increased choice, but also negatively biased evaluation, of an item that was merely similar to that reward. Such disjunctions were exhibited particularly by individuals low in intensity of felt affect, a finding supporting an emotional basis for relative harmonization of wanting and liking. These results demonstrate how dissociable psychological subsystems for wanting and liking can be driven in opposing directions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 114 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 7 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 47%
Business, Management and Accounting 25 20%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#611,839
of 28,738,224 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#1,127
of 4,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,934
of 193,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#14
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,738,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.