↓ Skip to main content

Stabilization and Expression of High Levels of p53 during Early Development in Xenopus laevis

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Biology, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stabilization and Expression of High Levels of p53 during Early Development in Xenopus laevis
Published in
Developmental Biology, September 1993
DOI 10.1006/dbio.1993.1230
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We previously isolated a p53 cDNA from a Xenopus oocyte library. To determine if p53 has a function in the developmental period, we have studied its expression at the RNA and protein levels during the early development of Xenopus laevis. Two p53 transcripts (3 and 2.2 kb) are expressed from the beginning of Xenopus oogenesis, and the major one (2.2 kb) reaches a level of 7 x 10(5) to 7 x 10(6) transcripts per mature oocyte. After fertilization only the 2.2-kb RNA is detected, but its level decreases and at the neurula stage p53 RNA becomes undetectable. The p53 protein is highly expressed during Xenopus development, in contrast to an undetectable level in Xenopus cells in culture. Most of the p53 protein is synthesized during late oogenesis and a stage VI oocyte contains 7 x 10(11) molecules of p53 protein. This maternal p53 store is maintained at a constant level during Xenopus development, at least until the tadpole stage. This high level of expression is mainly due to stabilization of the p53 protein. Unusually for p53, the protein is strictly located in the cytoplasm of oocytes and this localization might indicate that it is stored in an inactive form at this stage. These data are discussed relative to previous observations made in transgenic mice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2002.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Biology
#2,021
of 5,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,127
of 21,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Biology
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.