↓ Skip to main content

The Utility of Pulmonary Function Testing in Patients Presenting With Dysphonia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Voice, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Utility of Pulmonary Function Testing in Patients Presenting With Dysphonia
Published in
Journal of Voice, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the utility of pulmonary function testing (PFT), particularly forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25-75%, in patients presenting with dysphonia. A retrospective chart review was carried out. Records of 199 patients who presented with dysphonia were reviewed to determine whether in-office PFTs, which we perform routinely, lead to new pulmonary diagnoses or the need for additional pulmonary medications, after assessment by a pulmonologist. Of particular interest was evaluating if FEF25-75% of predicted values less than 80% can be used as a marker for occult pulmonary disease in patients presenting with dysphonia. Of the 199 patient charts reviewed, 129 were female and 70 were male. The age of patients ranged from 18 to 88 years, with a mean of 46.8 years. The body mass index ranged from 17.5 to 53.4 kg/m2. One hundred five (52.8%) patients had FEF25-75% values less than 80% of predicted (poor midflow values). Of these patients, 76 (72.4%) were referred to a pulmonologist, 22 of 76 (28.9%) completed the referral, and 17 of 22 (77.3%) received a new pulmonary diagnosis or change in medications. Of the 155 patients without a history of pulmonary disease, 76 had poor midflow values, 57 (75%) of these patients were referred, and 12 of 57 (21%) completed the referral. Eight (67%) of these 12 patients were diagnosed with a previously unrecognized pulmonary disorder. Of the 44 patients with a prior history of pulmonary disease, 29 (65.9%) had poor midflow values. Nineteen (65.5%) of these patients were referred, and 9 (47%) received a new pulmonary diagnosis or a change in their medications. There were 51 classically trained singers and 148 nonclassically trained singers or nonsingers. There was no significant difference in average midflow values between the two groups (80.96 ± 24.7 and 80.73 ± 28.4, respectively) or in the percentage of classically trained singers with poor midflow values compared with nonsingers (53.5% vs. 49%, respectively). This study suggests that patients with dysphonia may have unrecognized underlying pulmonary disease, and PFT should be considered as part of the routine initial voice evaluation for patients presenting with dysphonia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Unknown 15 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,580,591
of 27,634,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Voice
#383
of 2,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,115
of 345,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Voice
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,634,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.