↓ Skip to main content

Inpatient Interdisciplinary Care: Can the Goose Lay Some Golden Eggs?

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inpatient Interdisciplinary Care: Can the Goose Lay Some Golden Eggs?
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2430
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,487,678
of 26,488,660 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#6,440
of 11,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,743
of 277,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#118
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,488,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.