↓ Skip to main content

Requirement of a Critical Period of Transcription for Induction of a Late Phase of LTP

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Requirement of a Critical Period of Transcription for Induction of a Late Phase of LTP
Published in
Science, August 1994
DOI 10.1126/science.8066450
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Repeated high-frequency trains of stimuli induce long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 region that persists for up to 8 hours in hippocampal slices and for days in intact animals. This long time course has made LTP an attractive model for certain forms of long-term memory in the mammalian brain. A hallmark of long-term memory in the intact animal is a requirement for transcription, and thus whether the late phase of LTP (L-LTP) requires transcription was investigated here. With the use of different inhibitors, it was found in rat hippocampal slices that the induction of L-LTP [produced either by tetanic stimulation or by application of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) analog Sp-cAMPS (Sp-cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphorothioate)] was selectively prevented when transcription was blocked immediately after tetanization or during application of cAMP. As with behavioral memory, this requirement for transcription had a critical time window. Thus, the late phase of LTP in the CA1 region requires transcription during a critical period, perhaps because cAMP-inducible genes must be expressed during this period.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 366 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 22%
Researcher 67 17%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Student > Master 40 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 5%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 73 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 124 32%
Neuroscience 97 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Psychology 15 4%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 84 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,452,352
of 31,814,824 outputs
Outputs from Science
#36,884
of 91,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,395
of 28,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#39
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,814,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.