↓ Skip to main content

Time to change the blind men and the elephant approach to Parkinson disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Time to change the blind men and the elephant approach to Parkinson disease?
Published in
Neurology, June 2015
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001739
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that is associated with substantial morbidity and early mortality. Disease-related costs exceed $10 billion, not including medications, out-of-pocket expenses, or societal costs. Symptomatic treatment with levodopa, which has been available for over 30 years, and advanced therapies such as deep brain stimulation improve outcomes. Yet most new medications for PD provide a therapeutic benefit that is relatively modest compared to the benefits from levodopa. Despite dozens of neuroprotective clinical trials, there are no medications proven to slow the progression of the disease. Given these limitations, we provide evidence of the potential public health impact of a research agenda that emphasizes identification of risk factors to reduce disease burden through exposure mitigation. In addition, we emphasize health care policy that focuses on increasing health care expenditures for neurologic evaluation and management services to increase access to specialists to improve disease outcomes and reduce costs through better disease management.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,120,433
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#5,860
of 19,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,026
of 264,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#100
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.