↓ Skip to main content

Exclusive enteral nutrition in children with Crohn’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Gastroenterology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
4 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exclusive enteral nutrition in children with Crohn’s disease
Published in
World Journal of Gastroenterology, June 2015
DOI 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6809
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exclusive enteral nutrition involves the use of a complete liquid diet, with the exclusion of normal dietary components for a defined period of time, as a therapeutic measure to induce remission in active Crohn's disease (CD). This very efficacious approach leads to high rates of remission, especially in children and adolescents newly diagnosed with CD. This intervention also results in mucosal healing, nutritional improvements and enhanced bone health. Whilst several recent studies have provided further elaboration of the roles of exclusive enteral nutrition in the management of CD, other reports have provided new understanding of the mechanisms by which this intervention acts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 13 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 50 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 59 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,795,134
of 32,913,843 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Gastroenterology
#3,074
of 9,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,452
of 297,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Gastroenterology
#16
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,913,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.