↓ Skip to main content

Internal Sclerectomy with an Automated Trephine for Advanced Glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmology, June 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Internal Sclerectomy with an Automated Trephine for Advanced Glaucoma
Published in
Ophthalmology, June 1988
DOI 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33115-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An automated trephine (trabecuphine) was used to perform an internal sclerectomy in seven glaucoma patients who were aphakic or had undergone previous filtering surgery that had failed or both. A patent fistula was achieved intraoperatively in all seven eyes. Postoperatively, six patients received subconjunctival injection of 5-fluorouracil (5-FI) once daily for an average of 8 days. Five of seven patients have retained a functional bleb and a controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) after surgery (follow-up, 4-24 months). The only intraoperative complication was hemorrhage from the sclerectomy site in a patient with aniridia that resulted in a 20% hyphema. The hyphema cleared quickly, and the bleb has remained functional with a pressure of 12 mmHg for 9 months. The trabecuphine makes it possible to perform a glaucoma filtering operation safely from within the anterior chamber. This technique minimizes conjunctival trauma in the filtration area. The absence of a conjunctival incision overlying the fistula simplifies the adjunctive use of antimetabolites such as 5-FU.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 83%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,087,335
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#2,178
of 7,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,081
of 14,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.