↓ Skip to main content

Manuscript title: Geospatial analysis of Cancer risk and residential proximity to coal mines in Illinois

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Manuscript title: Geospatial analysis of Cancer risk and residential proximity to coal mines in Illinois
Published in
Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgia S. Mueller, Amanda L. Clayton, Whitney E. Zahnd, Kaitlin M. Hollenbeck, Mallory E. Barrow, Wiley D. Jenkins, Dennis R. Ruez

Abstract

Studies have indicated a population-level association between coal mining and cancer incidence and mortality, but few studies specifically examined residential proximity to this exposure using spatial analysis. We utilized a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) approach to perform spatial and statistical analyses to test two coal mining exposure variables and their associations with cancer incidence and mortality in Illinois--the fourth highest coal producing state in the United States. Data included age-adjusted county-level cancer incidence and mortality for five cancers: all malignant, lung, colorectal, breast (female) and prostate. Coal mining exposure was defined by two variables: coal production group and distance-weighted exposure. Spatial analyses were performed to identify spatial clustering. Correlation and stepwise regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between cancer incidence and mortality and coal mining exposures. Covariates considered in regression analyses included socioeconomic deprivation, former/current smoking prevalence, race, and rurality. Global spatial autocorrelation indicated significant spatial clustering of incidence, mortality and aggregated coal production. Distance-weighted exposure was significantly correlated with coal production group, age-adjusted all cancer incidence and age-adjusted all cancer mortality. Regression analyses indicated an association between recent coal production and colorectal cancer incidence (p=0.009) and mortality (p=0.035) and prostate cancer mortality (p=0.047). Distance weighted exposure was associated with lung cancer incidence (p=0.004) and mortality (p<0.001), and all cancer mortality (p<0.001). Coal production, incidence and mortality are spatially clustered in Illinois. Exposures to coal mining were associated with elevated risk of multiple cancers, most notably lung and colorectal. The environmental impact of the mining industry is substantial, and exposure of individuals residing near coal mines to known carcinogens is plausible. Future studies are needed to further elucidate the population exposure dynamics of coal mining, and should be explored using individual-level exposures and cancer outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 24 29%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#11,165,939
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#2,050
of 10,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,797
of 307,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.