Physicians who participate in preferred provider organizations (PPOs) usually agree to various types of utilization review and sometimes discount their charges or agree to accept lower fees. This study was performed to determine whether they provided more or fewer services to their PPO patients than to their indemnity patients and whether the discounting resulted in lower expenditures for each episode of illness. In 1984, Metropolitan Life offered PPO coverage to Dade County (Florida) school board employees and dependents but only a standard indemnity plan to Dade County government employees and dependents. Episodes of care were examined for patients with chest pain, hypertension, joint pain, gastrointestinal or liver disorders, and lower back pain cared for by physicians who treated patients in both the PPO and indemnity employee groups. For PPO patients, charges per physician service were the same or lower, but total physician charges during an episode were higher. For services such as laboratory tests, diagnostic x-rays, and room and board, PPO and indemnity patients' charges were not significantly different.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,256,168
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Medical care
#1,036
of 4,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,736
of 23,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical care
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
