Motoneurons grow into the chick hindlimb via consistent pathways, within which they make specific decisions leading to their correct targets. To determine which axonal guidance features dictate the position of the pathways and to examine the distribution of specific cues, we totally or partially ablated the early hindlimb bud and determined how the subsequent pattern of nerve outgrowth related to the distribution of tissue remnants. Our results suggest that local elements determine the gross anatomical pattern of outgrowth. First, determinants of individual pathways could be selectively removed without altering the pattern in other regions. Second, neurites were restricted to the plexus region at the base of the leg (within which, for unknown reasons, they proceeded posteriorly) unless distal permissive pathways or nearby target remnants were present. Finally, we found that the central region of the pelvic girdle, adjacent to the plexus region, determines the position where the major nerve trunks enter the leg. When gaps were introduced in this region of the girdle, nerves traversed the gaps and directly innervated adjacent muscle. The developing girdle is probably a nonpermissive environment for axon elongation, and axons enter the leg only where it is locally absent. Our results also support the concept that the specific cues that neurites use to reach their appropriate muscles are local. We find that neurites could make correct and specific decisions in the plexus region in the absence of all tissues distal to the pelvic girdle. This shows that the cues for these decisions are independent of the target and must reside in the local mesenchyme. In addition, when muscle remnants were present they were correctly innervated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 1995.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#13,285
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,581
of 13,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
