↓ Skip to main content

Fractionation of heparin-derived oligosaccharides by gradient polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical Journal, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fractionation of heparin-derived oligosaccharides by gradient polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis
Published in
Biochemical Journal, June 1987
DOI 10.1042/bj2440515
Pubmed ID
Authors

K G Rice, M K Rottink, R J Linhardt

Abstract

Heparin-derived oligosaccharides, prepared by using flavobacterial heparinase, having a high degree of heterogeneity (sequence variability) were resolved into sharp well-defined bands by using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The use of a stacking gel and a high-density-pore-gradient resolving gel was primarily responsible for the success of this separation. Low-Mr standards of known structure and having a degree of polymerization (dp) 2-6 were used to establish that the separation on gradient PAGE was primarily dependent on molecular size. High-Mr oligosaccharides (dp 8-20) were prepared using strong-anion-exchange h.p.l.c. and were used to help characterize the gradient PAGE separation. Kinetic profiles were obtained for the depolymerization of heparin and heparan sulphate with heparinase and heparitinase respectively. The utility of this approach in sequencing oligosaccharides derived from glycosaminoglycans is discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 25%
Chemistry 10 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 1994.
All research outputs
#10,947,373
of 31,542,270 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Journal
#5,226
of 15,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,114
of 15,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Journal
#15
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,542,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.