↓ Skip to main content

Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 1996
DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3787
Pubmed ID
Authors

J H Dieterich, B Kilgore

Abstract

The rate- and state-dependent constitutive formulation for fault slip characterizes an exceptional variety of materials over a wide range of sliding conditions. This formulation provides a unified representation of diverse sliding phenomena including slip weakening over a characteristic sliding distance Dc, apparent fracture energy at a rupture front, time-dependent healing after rapid slip, and various other transient and slip rate effects. Laboratory observations and theoretical models both indicate that earthquake nucleation is accompanied by long intervals of accelerating slip. Strains from the nucleation process on buried faults generally could not be detected if laboratory values of Dc apply to faults in nature. However, scaling of Dc is presently an open question and the possibility exists that measurable premonitory creep may precede some earthquakes. Earthquake activity is modeled as a sequence of earthquake nucleation events. In this model, earthquake clustering arises from sensitivity of nucleation times to the stress changes induced by prior earthquakes. The model gives the characteristic Omori aftershock decay law and assigns physical interpretation to aftershock parameters. The seismicity formulation predicts large changes of earthquake probabilities result from stress changes. Two mechanisms for foreshocks are proposed that describe observed frequency of occurrence of foreshock-mainshock pairs by time and magnitude. With the first mechanism, foreshocks represent a manifestation of earthquake clustering in which the stress change at the time of the foreshock increases the probability of earthquakes at all magnitudes including the eventual mainshock. With the second model, accelerating fault slip on the mainshock nucleation zone triggers foreshocks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Japan 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 134 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 91 63%
Engineering 15 10%
Physics and Astronomy 7 5%
Energy 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#65,716
of 102,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,338
of 26,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#266
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.