↓ Skip to main content

Specific erythrocyte binding is an additional nutrient acquisition system for Trichomonas vaginalis.

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine, June 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Specific erythrocyte binding is an additional nutrient acquisition system for Trichomonas vaginalis.
Published in
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, June 1990
DOI 10.1084/jem.171.6.2165
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Specific receptor-mediated binding by Trichomonas vaginalis of human erythrocytes was demonstrated. The ability of live parasites to internalize erythrocytes was also documented. In vitro growth assays during lipid-free and iron-limiting conditions that do not support the survival of T. vaginalis organisms showed that purified erythrocyte lipids and hemoglobin were each able to provide lipids and/or hemoglobin iron for trichomonal growth and multiplication. Parasites bound hemoglobin in a highly specific receptor-mediated fashion, and only the homologous unlabeled hemoglobin, but not lactoferrin and transferrin, competed with iodinated hemoglobin binding. Two antibody-crossreactive surface proteins of the parasites were identified as adhesins, and antibody to the individual adhesins inhibited T. vaginalis recognition and binding of erythrocytes. Finally, patient sera possessed antibody to the adhesins, showing the immunogenic nature and in vivo relevance of the trichomonad proteins during infection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 1999.
All research outputs
#12,428,062
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#8,929
of 13,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,815
of 23,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#46
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.