↓ Skip to main content

A Specific and Enduring Improvement in Visual Motion Discrimination

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Specific and Enduring Improvement in Visual Motion Discrimination
Published in
Science, November 1982
DOI 10.1126/science.7134968
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Training improves the ability of human observers to discriminate between two similar directions of motion. This gradual improvement is specific to the direction on which an observer is trained, and it endures for several months. Improvement does not affect motion perception generally, nor does it depend on recognition of details of the movement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United States 4 2%
Switzerland 3 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 184 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 25%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Neuroscience 24 12%
Computer Science 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 45 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,701,995
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Science
#39,267
of 77,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#947
of 8,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#32
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.