↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Method To Determine Protein Concentration in the Protein–Nanoparticle Conjugates Aqueous Solution Using Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
Published in
Analytical Chemistry, June 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01451
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Considerable efforts have been made to synthesize and characterize protein-nanoparticle conjugates (protein-NPs) for their promising applications in bionanotechnology. However, protein concentration determination in the protein-NPs has so far not been reported. In this letter, we present a simple and non-destructive approach to quantify the protein concentration in the protein-NPs aqueous solution using circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Carbon dots (~4 nm), gold nanoparticles (~10 nm) and polyethylene glycol (PEG, molecular weight ~3000) were either physically mixed or covalently conjugated (not in the case of gold nanoparticles) with proteins (human transferrin, human serum albumin, and ovalbumin). We were able to quantify the protein concentration in the protein-nanoparticle conjugates using a calibration curve from the CD spectra.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 43 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Materials Science 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 51 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,855,227
of 27,798,941 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Chemistry
#21,036
of 29,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,793
of 266,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Chemistry
#174
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,798,941 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.