↓ Skip to main content

Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease and related neuropathies: Mutation distribution and genotype‐phenotype correlation

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease and related neuropathies: Mutation distribution and genotype‐phenotype correlation
Published in
Annals of Neurology, December 2001
DOI 10.1002/ana.10089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 114 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor 8 7%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2009.
All research outputs
#5,155,379
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#2,370
of 6,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,642
of 184,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.