| Title |
Good Liars Are Neither ‘Dark’ Nor Self-Deceptive
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0127315 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Deception is a central component of the personality 'Dark Triad' (Machiavellianism, Psychopathy and Narcissism). However, whether individuals exhibiting high scores on Dark Triad measures have a heightened deceptive ability has received little experimental attention. The present study tested whether the ability to lie effectively, and to detect lies told by others, was related to Dark Triad, Lie Acceptability, or Self-Deceptive measures of personality using an interactive group-based deception task. At a group level, lie detection accuracy was correlated with the ability to deceive others-replicating previous work. No evidence was found to suggest that Dark Triad traits confer any advantage either to deceive others, or to detect deception in others. Participants who considered lying to be more acceptable were more skilled at lying, while self-deceptive individuals were generally less credible and less confident when lying. Results are interpreted within a framework in which repeated practice results in enhanced deceptive ability. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 93% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 68 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |