↓ Skip to main content

Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, February 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01471-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To retain cell viability, mammalian cells can increase damage repair in response to excessive radiation-induced injury. The adaptive response to small radiation doses is an example of this induced resistance and has been studied for many years, particularly in human lymphocytes. This review focuses on another manifestation of actively increased resistance that is of potential interest for developing improved radiotherapy, specifically the phenomenon in which cells die from excessive sensitivity to small single doses of ionizing radiation but remain more resistant (per unit dose) to larger single doses. In this paper, we propose possible mechanisms to explain this phenomenon based on our data accumulated over the last decade and a review of the literature.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 171 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Master 14 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Physics and Astronomy 33 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,204,491
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#1,427
of 15,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,647
of 161,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.