To compare the relative strength of photodynamic biologic tissue glue (PBTG) with that of 10-0 nylon sutures in closing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) wounds in cadaver eyes.
Corneal Research Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
A 7 mm central corneal trephination was performed on 8 recently enucleated human eyes. Each corneal button was removed and then resutured in its original position, using 4 interrupted 10-0 nylon cardinal sutures and PBTG (n = 7) or 16 interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures (n = 1). Wound leak and incisional bursting pressures were determined.
The average pressure at which wound leak and iris prolapse occurred was 124 mm Hg (range 70 to 180) and 185 mm Hg (range 90 to 300), respectively. The pressure required to create wound leak increased as the time between glue application and pressurization of the globe lengthened (mean 22 minutes, range 5 to 60 minutes), indicating that the bonding and stability of the adhesive increased with time. In contrast, the control eye developed wound leak at 70 mm Hg and iris prolapse at 300 mm Hg.
Photodynamic biologic tissue glue was comparable to sutures in providing adequate corneal wound strength in PKP in a cadaver eye model. Wound closure with PBTG may reduce the number of sutures required in corneal transplantation and decrease the incidence of suture-related complications and allograft rejection.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,262,974
of 33,666,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
#659
of 4,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,129
of 151,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,666,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
