↓ Skip to main content

The O-glycosylated Stalk Domain Is Required for Apical Sorting of Neurotrophin Receptors in Polarized MDCK Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, November 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The O-glycosylated Stalk Domain Is Required for Apical Sorting of Neurotrophin Receptors in Polarized MDCK Cells
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, November 1997
DOI 10.1083/jcb.139.4.929
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Delivery of newly synthesized membrane-spanning proteins to the apical plasma membrane domain of polarized MDCK epithelial cells is dependent on yet unidentified sorting signals present in the luminal domains of these proteins. In this report we show that structural information for apical sorting of transmembrane neurotrophin receptors (p75(NTR)) is localized to a juxtamembrane region of the extracellular domain that is rich in O-glycosylated serine/threonine residues. An internal deletion of 50 amino acids that removes this stalk domain from p75(NTR) causes the protein to be sorted exclusively of the basolateral plasma membrane. Basolateral sorting stalk-minus p75(NTR) does not occur by default, but requires sequences present in the cytoplasmic domain. The stalk domain is also required for apical secretion of a soluble form of p75(NTR), providing the first demonstration that the same domain can mediate apical sorting of both a membrane-anchored as well as secreted protein. However, the single N-glycan present on p75(NTR) is not required for apical sorting of either transmembrane or secreted forms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 9 9%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2009.
All research outputs
#12,343,598
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#8,309
of 13,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,988
of 131,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#67
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.