↓ Skip to main content

Development of Heritable Melanoma in Transgenic Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development of Heritable Melanoma in Transgenic Mice
Published in
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, March 1998
DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00133.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transfer of genetic material into recipient cells by transfection has been used successfully to isolate genes responsible for particular phenotypic traits. By using this strategy, DNA fragments were isolated that when transfected into appropriate uncommitted cells will commit the recipient cells to undergo adipocyte differentiation. Transgenic mice were generated with one of the active DNA clones, Clone B. The transgenic mice were expected to display an adipocyte-related phenotype; however, the animals developed melanin containing tumors at a young age. Insertion of Clone B into the mouse DNA probably interrupted a gene(s) that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, specifically regulation of cell growth in melanin-producing cells. Histopathologic analysis of these mice showed dark spots on the ear lobes of the animals as early as 10-12 d of age. By 3 mo, in addition to the ear lobes, pigmented tumors could be observed in other organs. A significant number of these transgenic mice died within 1 y of age. The melanomas developed spontaneously in these animals in the absence of any known chemical carcinogen or ultraviolet radiation. This line of mice provides a way of identifying genes involved in regulation of cell growth control and differentiation. These mice also serve as a model system to investigate the molecular, genetic, and phenotypic characterization and development of melanomas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Other 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#4,009
of 9,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,015
of 35,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.