↓ Skip to main content

CD30 in Normal and Neoplastic Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Immunology, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
14 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CD30 in Normal and Neoplastic Cells
Published in
Clinical Immunology, February 1999
DOI 10.1006/clim.1998.4636
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 1982 Stein and coworkers identified a new molecule, CD30 (Ki-1), which is expressed by Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells of Hodgkin's Disease (HD) (1). Although CD30 is not a specific RS cell marker, its characterization has assumed an important role not only in the differential diagnosis of HD, but also in the identification of a morphologically and clinically distinct type of large cell lymphoma, now designated as anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) (2). The cloning of human and murine CD30 and the utilization of genetically manipulated animal models have rapidly expanded our knowledge on its physiological role in lymphoid development and differentiation. The goal of this review is to present an overview of this rapidly evolving field and discuss the role of CD30 in normal and neoplastic lymphoid cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2025.
All research outputs
#3,042,869
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Immunology
#168
of 2,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,378
of 144,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Immunology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.