↓ Skip to main content

Differential Expression of the Two Arabidopsis Nitrate Reductase Genes 1

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Physiology, May 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differential Expression of the Two Arabidopsis Nitrate Reductase Genes 1
Published in
Plant Physiology, May 1991
DOI 10.1104/pp.96.1.275
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The differential regulation of the two nitrate reductase (NR, EC 1.6.6.1) genes of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh was examined. cDNAs corresponding to each of the NR genes (NR1 and NR2) were used to measure changes in the steady-state levels of NR mRNA in response to nitrate, light, circadian rhythm, and tissue specificity. Although nitrate-induction kinetics of the two genes are very similar, NR1 is expressed in the absence of nitrate at a higher basal level than NR2. Nitrate induction is transient both in the roots and leaves, however the kinetics are different: the induction and decline in the roots precede that in the leaves. Light induces the expression of each of the genes with significantly different kinetics: NR2 reached saturation more rapidly than did NR1. Both genes showed similar diurnal patterns of circadian rhythm, with NR2 mRNA accumulating earlier in the morning.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Chile 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 52 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Plant Physiology
#6,500
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,038
of 18,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Physiology
#21
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.