↓ Skip to main content

Microarray Analysis and Organization of Circadian Gene Expression in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microarray Analysis and Organization of Circadian Gene Expression in Drosophila
Published in
Cell, November 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00545-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have used high-density oligonucleotide arrays to study global circadian gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Coupled with an analysis of clock mutant (Clk) flies, a cell line designed to identify direct targets of the CLOCK (CLK) transcription factor and differential display, we uncovered several striking features of circadian gene networks. These include the identification of 134 cycling genes, which contribute to a wide range of diverse processes. Many of these clock or clock-regulated genes are located in gene clusters, which appear subject to transcriptional coregulation. All oscillating gene expression is under clk control, indicating that Drosophila has no clk-independent circadian systems. An even larger number of genes is affected in Clk flies, suggesting that clk affects other genetic networks. As we identified a small number of direct target genes, the data suggest that most of the circadian gene network is indirectly regulated by clk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 3 1%
China 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 235 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 30%
Researcher 64 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 9%
Student > Master 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 29 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 13%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 33 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,884,145
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#13,120
of 17,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,677
of 51,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#53
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.