↓ Skip to main content

Immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and antibody therapy of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in oncology, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunostimulatory CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and antibody therapy of cancer
Published in
Seminars in oncology, August 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0093-7754(03)00236-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing CG motifs (CpG ODN) have potent immunostimulatory properties, and have potential as immunotherapeutic agents in cancer. Animal models suggest CpG ODN can activate a variety of immune effector cells such as natural killer (NK) cells, and also enhance the efficacy of tumor immunization when used as immune adjuvants or to directly activate antigen-presenting cells. CpG ODN are also capable of altering the expression of a number of antigens by malignant B-cells, including those targeted by monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) and those involved in communication with T cells. The ability of CpG ODN to activate the immune effector cells that participate in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), upregulate target antigen, and perhaps induce development of an active immune response, suggest these agents may be capable of enhancing the efficacy of antitumor moAb therapy. Such enhanced efficacy has been demonstrated in animal models and is now undergoing evaluation in clinical trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,591,124
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in oncology
#439
of 2,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,614
of 76,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in oncology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.