↓ Skip to main content

Outcome of the First wwPDB Hybrid/Integrative Methods Task Force Workshop

Overview of attention for article published in Structure, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Outcome of the First wwPDB Hybrid/Integrative Methods Task Force Workshop
Published in
Structure, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.str.2015.05.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Structures of biomolecular systems are increasingly computed by integrative modeling that relies on varied types of experimental data and theoretical information. We describe here the proceedings and conclusions from the first wwPDB Hybrid/Integrative Methods Task Force Workshop held at the European Bioinformatics Institute in Hinxton, UK, on October 6 and 7, 2014. At the workshop, experts in various experimental fields of structural biology, experts in integrative modeling and visualization, and experts in data archiving addressed a series of questions central to the future of structural biology. How should integrative models be represented? How should the data and integrative models be validated? What data should be archived? How should the data and models be archived? What information should accompany the publication of integrative models?

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Italy 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 133 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Professor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 25%
Chemistry 12 8%
Computer Science 7 5%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2025.
All research outputs
#3,694,982
of 31,393,817 outputs
Outputs from Structure
#553
of 4,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,669
of 291,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Structure
#9
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,393,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.