↓ Skip to main content

花粉―食物アレルギー症候群に対するシラカバ花粉エキス皮下免疫療法の有効性の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
花粉―食物アレルギー症候群に対するシラカバ花粉エキス皮下免疫療法の有効性の検討
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, May 2018
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.67.211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuntaro Tsumagari, Satomi Mori, Hiroko Ishizu, Yutaka Tanaka, Yoshihisa Okamoto, Kazuyuki Kurihara

Abstract

Recently, patients with oral allergy syndrome (OAS) to fruits or vegetables caused by pollenfood allergy syndrome (PFAS) have increased nationwide. We examined effectiveness of SCIT using birch pollen extract for PFAS. A total of 19 patients (9 male and 10 female) underwent SCIT with birch pollen extract from August 2011 to August 2016. Rush schedule was used for the initial updosing for SCIT in a hospital setting. In maintenance phase, SCIT was administered every 4-8 weeks on an outpatient basis. According to the situation of sensitization, patients underwent SCIT with other extracts at the same time. Oral food challenge (OFC) with fruits and vegetables was performed at baseline and after rush phase. We also investigated about OAS symptoms in maintenance phase. SCIT was remarkably effective in five patients for OAS symptoms just after rush phase, and effective in nine patients. And it was not effective in two patients, and not determined in three patients, but it was confirmed to be effective in four out of these five patients in maintenance phase. There were relapse of OAS symptoms in three patients, then SCIT was remarkably effective or effective in 15 patients (79%) in maintenance phase. No patients dropped off the SCIT protocol. Generally, PFAS can't be expected to remit naturally. SCIT with birch pollen extract effectively reduces OAS symptoms, and it can be expected as a radical therapy for PFAS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#335
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,381
of 343,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them