You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retracted: Does natural variation in diversity affect biotic resistance?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.12439 |
| Authors |
Susan Harrison, Howard Cornell, James B. Grace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Réunion | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,894,981
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#2,035
of 3,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,759
of 267,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#27
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.