↓ Skip to main content

Assaying genome-wide recombination and centromere functions with Arabidopsis tetrads

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
25 patents

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assaying genome-wide recombination and centromere functions with Arabidopsis tetrads
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 1998
DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.1.247
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During meiosis, crossover events generate new allelic combinations, yet the abundance of these genetic exchanges in individual cells has not been measured previously on a genomic level. To perform a genome-wide analysis of recombination, we monitored the assortment of genetic markers in meiotic tetrads from Arabidopsis. By determining the number and distribution of crossovers in individual meiotic cells, we demonstrated (i) surprisingly precise regulation of crossover number in each meiosis, (ii) considerably reduced recombination along chromosomes carrying ribosomal DNA arrays, and (iii) an inversely proportional relationship between recombination frequencies and chromosome size. This use of tetrad analysis also achieved precise mapping of all five Arabidopsis centromeres, localizing centromere functions in the intact chromosomes of a higher eukaryote.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Professor 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 16%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,145,798
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#48,619
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,764
of 132,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#127
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.