↓ Skip to main content

Serum neutralizing antibody response to the vacuolating cytotoxin of Helicobacter pylori.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Serum neutralizing antibody response to the vacuolating cytotoxin of Helicobacter pylori.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, September 1992
DOI 10.1172/jci115967
Pubmed ID
Authors

T L Cover, P Cao, U K Murthy, M S Sipple, M J Blaser

Abstract

Approximately 50% of Helicobacter pylori isolates produce a cytotoxin in vitro that induces vacuolation of eukaryotic cells. To determine the in vivo relevance of this phenomenon, we sought to detect cytotoxin-neutralizing antibodies in sera from H. pylori-infected persons. As a group, sera from 29 H. pylori-infected patients neutralized the activity of the purified cytotoxin to a significantly greater extent than sera from 24 uninfected persons (P = 0.007). The cytotoxin neutralizing activity in sera from H. pylori-infected persons was mediated predominantly by the purified IgG fraction. Sera from H. pylori-infected persons neutralized the cytotoxins produced by multiple H. pylori strains, but failed to neutralize trimethylamine-induced cell vacuolation. Neutralization of cytotoxin activity by human or immune rabbit sera was associated with immunoblot IgG recognition of an 87-kD H. pylori protein. Similarly, neutralization of the toxin by sera was associated with IgG recognition of the purified cytotoxin in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (P less than 0.0001). The presence of cytotoxin-neutralizing antibodies in sera from H. pylori-infected persons indicates that the cytotoxin is synthesized in vivo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2011.
All research outputs
#7,405,506
of 34,043,423 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#9,385
of 20,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,629
of 26,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#35
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,043,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.