↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of broken DNA molecules associated with V(D)J recombination.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Characterization of broken DNA molecules associated with V(D)J recombination.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 1993
DOI 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10788
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We previously demonstrated that DNA molecules with double-strand breaks at variable-(diversity)-joining [V(D)J] recombination signal sequences are relatively abundant in mouse thymocytes. This abundance strongly suggests that the mechanism of V(D)J recombination involves double-strand cleavage at recombination signals. As a first step toward understanding the mechanism of cleavage, we used a sensitive PCR assay to characterize the structure of one class of cleavage products, the signal ends, in detail. Here we demonstrate that most of these ends are blunt and terminate in 5' phosphoryl groups. Virtually all of the flush signal ends are full length. A minor subpopulation of broken ends terminates in short single-strand extensions. We have found no evidence for covalent DNA-protein linkages involving the signal ends. These data allow further refinement of the double-strand cleavage model for V(D)J recombination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Singapore 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,639,012
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#63,613
of 119,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,802
of 29,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#181
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.